Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolkas psychological dance with death and depravity is for the public to decide and not for the government to stifle.
(PRWEB) August 27, 2005 -- Michael D. Sellers' movie "Karla" must be supported for many reasons. The most important is the fact that the film and television industry by its very nature is pure entrepreneurship, pure creativity and pure freedom of expression.
There are too many people who are stuck in poverty because they can not find traditional employment, they cannot finance their own businesses, and they can not find gainful employment with someone else who has found financing to start their own business.
The short answer is it is a vicious cycle. The long answer is that when companies likeQuantum Entertaiment and Movie Bank Quantum and MB Partenrs Fund create a movie, it creates employment: something that Canada and the United States desperately need.
Consequently, when government sticks its nose where it doesn't belong to stifle, and Stuart Weinstein see livid red.
Stuart Weinstein is not alone in his assessment. Major media that have reviewed the movie have endorsed it. The story has received major coverage in both the United States and Canada. In fact, it is beyond the point that the government has any right to censor, or decide who can see it and who can not.
There are just too many people with too much education, too much potential that are falling through the cracks. So when something has broken through--it can't and won't be stifled.
Come hell or high water, Michael D. Seller's movie "Karla" will have a full distribution run (especially in Canada).